To the average consumer, there is little difference between the Exynos 9810 and Snapdragon 845 variants. Under-the-hood, however, the difference in chipsets can lead to wildly different experiences. Best mobiles with FM Radio. 1 Honor Magic4. 2 Motorola Moto G200 5G. 3 Lenovo Legion Y90. 4 Oukitel WP19. 5 Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+. Compare the best cell phones that incorporate FM radio, so you can listen to the radio without consuming your data rate. With NFC. Dual sim. Esto significa que Android 10 será la última actualización para los S9 y S9 Plus desde que se lanzaron con. Samsung Galaxy S9 / S9 + - View Software Version Check the Software Updates page to see if your device's most recent software version is listed. Samsung Exynos 9810 @ 1.8 GHz 593 OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G @ 1.8 GHz 592 Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810 @ 1.9 GHz 589 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 @ 1.9 GHz 1390 Huawei Honor View 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970 @ 1.8 GHz 1387 Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 @ 1.7 GHz 1385 Samsung A12 (A125F) ANDROID 11 Frp Remove Done ONE CLICK. 1- Open UMT MTK .4,4V . interface. 2- Go to MTK ONE CLICK. 3- Disassemble the phone and connect the TEST POİNT , download the image, 4- Select the reset frp option, press EXCUTE. 5- Connect the phone. It should be noted that the CLK point on the board is very sensitive. Samsung Galaxy Book2 360 Convertible Laptop, Intel Core i7 Qualcomm expected 25-30% increased performance in task run on the high-performance cores, and 15% increase on efficiency cores, relative to the Snapdragon 835. Testing found significant advantages in performance and efficiency compared with the Exynos 8895 and 9810. The Kryo 385 is also used in the Snapdragon 850. VPk5d. We compared the characteristics of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 and Samsung Exynos 9810 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023 Snapdragon 835 benefits GPU frequency vs 572 Memory frequency vs 1800 Samsung Exynos 9810 benefits CPU 110029 27263 better vs 82766 GPU 143277 38493 better vs 104784 Total AnTuTu score 416105 100311 better vs 315794 Frequency 2900 450 better vs 2450 FLOPS 658 100 better vs 558 Comparison of all specifications AnTuTu 9 CPU 82766 110029 27263 better GPU 104784 143277 38493 better Memory 51047 67847 UX 76162 93390 Total AnTuTu score 315794 416105 100311 better GeekBench 5 Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark Stability no data 95% Graphics test 6 FPS 13 FPS Score 1132 2333 CPU Architecture 4x ГГц – Kryo 280 Cortex-A734x ГГц – Kryo 280 Cortex-A53 4x ГГц – Exynos M34x ГГц – Cortex-A55 Number of Cores 8 8 Frequency 2450 2900 450 better Instruction set ARMv8-A Process technology 10 нм 10 нм TDP 9 Вт 5 Вт L2 cache 2 МБ no data Number of transistors 3 млрд. млрд. L1 cache 128 КБ no data L3 cache no data 4 МБ graphics accelerator GPU Adreno 540 Mali-G72MP18 Architecture Adreno 500 Bifrost GPU frequency 710 138 better 572 Computing blocks 2 18 shader blocks 256 288 Vulcan version OpenCL Version DirectX Version 12 12 FLOPS 558 658 100 better RAM Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1866 66 better 1800 Tire 2x 32 Бит 4x 16 Бит Bandwidth До Гбит/сек До Гбит/сек Volume До 8 ГБ До 6 ГБ Multimedia neural processor Hexagon 682 Да Drive type UFS UFS Max. display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160 Max. camera resolution 1x 32МП, 2x 16МП 1x 24МП, 2x 16МП Video recording 4K при 30FPS 4K при 120FPS Video playback 4K при 60FPS 4K при 120FPS Codec support VP9 VP9 Audio AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Communications and networks 4G support LTE Cat. 16 LTE Cat. 19 5G support Нет Нет Download speed До 1000 Мбит/с До 1200 Мбит/с Download speed До 150 Мбит/с До 200 Мбит/с Wi-Fi 5 5 Bluetooth 5 5 Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Modem X16 LTE Shannon 360 LTE general information Class Флагман Флагман Model number MSM8998 S5E9810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 has been announced on November 2016 whereas Samsung Exynos 9810 has been announced on January 2018. Check out detailed comparison with key specs belowBenchmark Comparison Snapdragon 835 vs Exynos 9810 Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Snapdragon 835 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 283331 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 81260, 109179, 49789, 38165 Comparison Snapdragon 835 vs Exynos 9810CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Snapdragon 835 comes up with the architecture of Adreno 500 and Exynos 9810 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2450 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2900 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster Comparison Snapdragon 835 vs Exynos 9810Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 has Adreno 540 GPU with GPU Frequency as 710 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. Samsung Exynos 9810 has Mali-G72MP18 GPU with GPU Frequency as 572 Comparison Snapdragon 835 vs Exynos 9810First chipset has max size of 8 GB and Samsung Exynos 9810 has max size of 8 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a and Connectivity Comparison Snapdragon 835 vs Exynos 9810In terms of multimedia, Snapdragon 835 has Hexagon 682 NPU with storage type as UFS and Exynos 9810 has Yes NPU and UFS storage type. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835Samsung Exynos 9810Mengapa Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 lebih baik daripada Samsung Exynos 9810?GPU clock speed 138MHz lebih cepat?710MHzvs572MHzMengapa Samsung Exynos 9810 lebih baik daripada Qualcomm Snapdragon 835?CPU speed lebih cepat?4 x & 4 x x & 4 x lebih cepat?1200MBits/svs1024MBits/sMenggunakan HMP?Mengupload lebih cepat?200MBits/svs150MBits/sKanal memori 2 buah lebih banyak?4vs2Hasil Geekbench 5 single-core lebih tinggi?685vs372Hasil Geekbench 5 multi-core lebih tinggi?2028vs1461Cache L1 256KB lebih besar?384KBvs128KBUlasan penggunaPeringkat keseluruhanQualcomm Snapdragon 8354 Ulasan penggunaQualcomm Snapdragon 835Samsung Exynos 98103 Ulasan penggunaSamsung Exynos 9810FiturInfo UmumSistem operasi 32-bit hanya dapat mendukung RAM sampai 4GB. Sedangkan 64-bit bisa lebih dari 4GB, otomatis performanya lebih baik. Sistem 64-bit juga bisa menjalankan aplikasi kartu grafis yang disematkan, kamu tidak perlu membeli kartu grafis kecil memberikan kinerja yang lebih baik dan konsumsi daya yang lebih rendah. Chipset dengan jumlah transistor yang lebih banyak, komponen semikonduktor perangkat elektronik menawarkan lebih banyak daya komputasi. Faktor bentuk kecil memungkinkan lebih banyak transistor untuk dipasang pada sebuah chip, oleh karena itu meningkatkan Processing Unit GPU memiliki kecepatan clock yang lebih digunakan untuk permainan, dengan versi terbaru mendukung grafik yang lebih wireless generasi kelima memberikan kecepatan yang lebih tinggi dan latensi yang lebih rendah daripada teknologi generasi keempat GPU Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Samsung Exynos 9810Ketika GPU berjalan di bawah ambang batasnya, dapat dipacu ke clock speed yang lebih tinggi untuk meningkatkan OpenGL ES Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Samsung Exynos 9810OpenGL ES digunakan untuk permainan di perangkat mobile seperti smartphones. Versi terbaru untuk grafik yang lebih baikversi OpenCL Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Samsung Exynos 9810Beberapa aplikasi menggunakan OpenCL untuk mengatur Graphics Processing Unit GPU untuk komputasi non-graphical. Versi terbaru memperkenalkan banyak fungsi dan performa lebih CPU menunjukkan berapa banyak siklus pemrosesan per detik yang dapat dijalankan oleh CPU, dengan mempertimbangkan semua intinya unit pemrosesan. Ini dihitung dengan menambahkan clock rate masing-masing inti atau, dalam hal prosesor multi-inti yang menggunakan berbagai arsitektur mikro, masing-masing kelompok banyak hasil thread dalam performa yang lebih cepat dan multitasking yang lebih teknologi sebuah chip dapat beralih di antara dua set inti prosesor untuk memaksimalkan kinerja dan daya tahan baterai. Misalnya, saat bermain game, inti yang lebih kuat akan digunakan untuk meningkatkan kinerja, sedangkan memeriksa email akan menggunakan inti yang kurang kuat untuk memaksimalkan daya tahan Multi-Processing HMP adalah versi yang lebih canggih dari teknologi Dalam pengaturan ini, prosesor dapat menggunakan semua inti pada saat yang sama, atau hanya satu inti untuk tugas dengan intensitas rendah. Sehingga dapat memberikan kinerja yang kuat atau meningkatkan daya tahan waktu turbo Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Samsung Exynos 9810Ketika CPU berjalan di bawah ambang batasnya, dapat dipacu ke clock speed yang lebih tinggi untuk meningkatkan cache lebih besar di CPU yang lebih cepat dan cache lebih besar di CPU yang lebih cepat dan clock Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Samsung Exynos 9810Clock multiplier mengatur kecepatan CPUcache L3 Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835L3 cache lebih besar di CPU yang lebih cepat dan memori yang lebih cepat, yang menghasilkan performa sistem lebih memori DDR Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Samsung Exynos 9810Memori DDR Double Data Rate adalah jenis RAM paling umum. Versi DDR yang lebih baru mendukung kecepatan maksimum yang lebih tinggi dan lebih hemat memori maksimum RAM yang adalah tingkat maksimum yang data dapat dibaca dari atau disimpan ke dalam banyak kanal memori meningkatkan kecepatan perpindahan data antara memori dan CPUversi eMMC Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Samsung Exynos 9810Versi eMMC yang lebih tinggi memungkinkan antarmuka memori yang lebih cepat, berdampak positif pada kinerja perangkat. Misalnya, saat mentransfer file dari komputer ke penyimpanan internal melalui kode perbaikan kesalahan dapat mendeteksi kerusakan data. Ini digunakan ketika sangat penting menghidari kerusakan, seperti scientific computing atau ketika menjalankan pada sebuah chip SoC memiliki chip seluler LTE terintegrasi. LTE mampu men-download dengan kecepatan lebih cepat dari yang sebelumnya yaitu, teknologi unduh adalah ukuran bandwith koneksi internet, menunjukkan tingkat pengiriman data maksimum yang digunakan suatu perangkat untuk mengakses konten unggah adalah ukuran bandwidth koneksi internet, menunjukkan tingkat pengiriman data maksimum di mana sebuah perangkat dapat mengirim informasi ke server atau perangkat teknologi yang diintegrasikan kepada processor untuk mengamankan perangkat untuk digunakan dengan fitur-fitur seperti pembayaran telepon, dan video streaming menggunakan digital rights management DRMTeknologi multithreading seperti Hyperthreading dari Intel atau Simultanous Multithreading dari AMD memberikan peningkatan kinerja dengan memisahkan tiap-tiap inti fisik prosesor menjadi inti virtual, yang juga dikenal sebagai thread. Dengan cara ini, setiap inti dapat menjalankan dua aliran instruksi bit membantu melindungi komputer dari serangan menyediakan akeslerasi untuk memproses media, seperti mendengarkan MP3AES digunakan untuj mempercepat enkripsi dan Floating-Point VFP digunakan oleh processor untuk memberikan peningkatan kinerja di area seperti gambar 5 adalah perbandingan lintas platform yang mengukur kinerja inti tunggal prosesor Sumber Primate Labs, 2023Geekbench 5 adalah perbandingan lintas platform yang mengukur kinerja inti banyak dari sebuah prosesor Sumber Primate Labs, 2023hasil PassMark Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Samsung Exynos 9810Penghitungan ini mengukur kinerja CPU menggunakan multiple threadhasil PassMark tunggal Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Samsung Exynos 9810Penghitungan ini mengukur performa CPU menggunakan single threadhasil PassMark overclocked Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Samsung Exynos 9810Penghitungan ini mengukur performa CPU ketika di Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9200 PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Plus Gen 3Tunjukkan semua Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 vs Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 9810Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Mobile Platform MSM8998 is a high-end SoC for smartphones mostly Android based that was released early 2017. Its one of the first processors that is manufactured in 10 nm LPE FinFET at Samsung. The SD835 is the successor to the Snapdragon 821. It integrates 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for performance and 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X16 LTE modem, WiFi, a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller, an UFS controller, Hexagon 682 DSP, Spectra 180 Image Seonsor Prozessor, Bluetooth GPS, GLONASS, Baeidou, Galileo Satellite Exynos 9825 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9825 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in the Samsung Note 10 line in August 2019. The processor integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to GHz up from GHz in the 9820. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro 8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload. The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. Thanks to higher clock rates, the G76 is now a bit faster compared to the Exynos 9820. The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. Due to the slight changes in clock rates, it is very comparable to the older Eynos 9 9820. Maybe in longer load phases, the improved 7nm process helps to maintain clock speeds a bit better. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 7nm LPP with EUV process that should improve power efficiency compared to the Exynos Exynos 9810 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series at least partly. It integrates eight CPU cores octa core in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898. The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports LTE for up to Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload. As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20. Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card. The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos as before 4k120 and VP9 de- and encoding. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process that should also help with some of the performance Snapdragon 835 8998Samsung Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos 9810SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung ExynosSamsung ExynosCodenameKryo 280Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Clock2450 MHz1900 - 2730 MHz 3000 MillionTechnology10 nm7 nm10 nmFeaturesX16 LTE Modem, Adreno 540 GPU, Hexagon DSP, Spectra 180 Camera, Aqstic Audio, IZat Location, Haven SecurityARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 LPDDR4x Memory ControllerARM Mali-G72MP18 GPU , 4x Exynos M3 max GHz, 4x Cortex-A55 max GHz LPDDR4x Memory ControlleriGPUQualcomm Adreno 540 - 710 MHzARM Mali-G76 MP12ARM Mali-G72 MP18ArchitectureARMARMARMAnnounced ManufacturerQualcomm Snapdragon SD 835Samsung Exynos Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos Exynos 9810Series Exynos Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos 9825 - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos 9810 - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos 9810 - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55BenchmarksCinebench - Cinebench CPU Multi 64 BitCinebench - Cinebench CPU Single 64 BitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single 32bitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi 32bit3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physicsmin 1493 avg 1501 median 4% max 1508 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 6729 avg 19196 median 20406 17% max 23046 Points min 31908 avg 32588 median 32588 27% max 33268 Points min 18756 avg 23944 median 26226 22% max 26851 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1520 avg 2849 median 2969 37% max 3161 Points min 3389 avg 3519 median 3519 44% max 3649 Points min 2546 avg 2717 median 33% max 3120 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1631 avg 2766 median 2960 42% max 3189 Points min 3498 avg 3622 median 3622 52% max 3746 Points min 2561 avg 2752 median 38% max 3148 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 805 avg 814 median 4% max 822 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2177 avg 2184 median 2184 7% max 2191 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1809 avg 1917 median 1920 20% max 1973 Points min 4549 avg 4550 median 4550 47% max 4551 Points min 3688 avg 3721 median 3698 38% max 3776 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 6006 avg 6515 median 6517 7% max 6799 Points min 10367 avg 10426 median 12% max 10484 Points min 8786 avg 8874 median 8874 10% max 8963 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 814 avg 1733 median 2021 29% max 2075 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2952 avg 5482 median 15% max 6552 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Coremin 3960 avg 4100 median 4100 7% max 4240 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Coremin 1144 avg 1155 median 1155 23% max 1166 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5674 avg 6126 median 6126 10% max 6578 Points min 5895 avg 5915 median 5915 9% max 5935 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1933 avg 1954 median 1954 29% max 1975 Points min 1961 avg 1965 median 1965 29% max 1969 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 1810 avg 2308 median 2308 19% max 2806 Points min 895 avg 1039 median 1039 8% max 1183 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 2528 avg 3500 median 32% max 4471 Points min 1898 avg 2002 median 18% max 2105 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11609 avg 12054 median 24% max 12498 Points min 10213 avg 10328 median 10328 20% max 10443 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5777 avg 5936 median 12% max 6094 Points min 5651 avg 5656 median 5656 11% max 5661 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 7193 avg 7226 median 7226 19% max 7259 Points min 6025 avg 6099 median 16% max 6172 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 2425 avg 3219 median 3175 4% max 4813 ms min 2478 avg 2503 median 2503 3% max 2528 ms min 2060 avg 2509 median 2394 3% max 3189 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score *min 210 avg median 3% max 387 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 3086 avg 11209 median 11484 11% max 14300 Points min 18908 avg 19022 median 18% max 19135 Points min 12933 avg 14397 median 14% max 15233 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 97 avg median 25% max 118 Points min 63 avg median 68 16% max 72 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 150208 avg 173235 median 175032 60% max 185487 Points min 291772 avg 292608 median 292608 100% max 293444 Points min 214090 avg 218110 median 217950 74% max 222290 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 8164 avg 9635 median 27% max 16148 Points min 18280 avg 18321 median 56% max 18361 Points min 7800 avg 8235 median 8294 25% max 8612 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 42180 avg 44325 median 53% max 47943 Points min 70640 avg 70670 median 87% max 70699 Points min 53528 avg 55588 median 55698 68% max 57538 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 77533 avg 82910 median 83517 26% max 85868 Points min 155432 avg 155907 median 155906 48% max 156381 Points min 91292 avg 92956 median 92887 29% max 94690 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 68241 avg 71814 median 44% max 73371 Points min 101869 avg 102259 median 102259 63% max 102649 Points min 80534 avg 86884 median 88577 54% max 91540 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 201881 avg 208685 median 208251 37% max 217442 Points min 347082 avg 347156 median 347156 61% max 347229 Points min 236552 avg 243663 median 243861 43% max 250577 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total ScorePassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 121702 avg 154312 median 154312 20% max 186922 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Battery Lifemin 476 avg 551 median 11% max 585 min PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 3393 avg 3679 median 3705 20% max 3874 Points min 2385 avg 2407 median 2407 13% max 2429 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 3927 avg 4679 median 4655 10% max 5195 Points min 5088 avg 5342 median 11% max 5595 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 5603 avg 6743 median 44% max 7510 Points min 8801 avg 8914 median 8914 58% max 9027 Points min 5184 avg 5411 median 5305 35% max 5851 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 6854 avg 7925 median 40% max 9927 Points min 11011 avg 11412 median 11412 57% max 11813 Points min 5736 avg 6022 median 5891 29% max 6571 Points Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 → 100% n=30Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9825 → 163% n=30Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 107% n=30 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 12. 2221290 checking url part for id 8554 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 11485 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8554 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 8554 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11485 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 11485 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 9632 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 15 return log +0s ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11 Samsung Exynos 9810 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series at least partly. It integrates eight CPU cores octa core in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898. The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports LTE for up to Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload. As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20. Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card. The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos as before 4k120 and VP9 de- and encoding. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process that should also help with some of the performance Snapdragon 835 8998 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Mobile Platform MSM8998 is a high-end SoC for smartphones mostly Android based that was released early 2017. Its one of the first processors that is manufactured in 10 nm LPE FinFET at Samsung. The SD835 is the successor to the Snapdragon 821. It integrates 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for performance and 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X16 LTE modem, WiFi, a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller, an UFS controller, Hexagon 682 DSP, Spectra 180 Image Seonsor Prozessor, Bluetooth GPS, GLONASS, Baeidou, Galileo Satellite Exynos 9820 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9820 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced late 2018 and was first integrated in the Samsung Galaxy S10 smartphones early 2019. The SoC integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to GHz. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro 8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload. The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. The single core performance is, thanks to the big custom cores, a strong suit of the CPU and reaches the levels of Apples mobile SoCs. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks. The predecessor Exynos 9810 can be bested by around 17% in our first benchmarks with the Galaxy S10 Plus. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 8nm LPP process that should also help with some of the performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 9820 Cinebench - Cinebench CPU Multi 64 BitCinebench - Cinebench CPU Single 64 BitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single 32bitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi 32bit3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physicsmin 1493 avg 1501 median 4% max 1508 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 18756 avg 23944 median 26226 22% max 26851 Points min 6729 avg 19196 median 20406 17% max 23046 Points min 31297 avg 32016 median 27% max 32308 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2546 avg 2717 median 33% max 3120 Points min 1520 avg 2849 median 2969 37% max 3161 Points min 2925 avg 3123 median 38% max 3480 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2561 avg 2752 median 38% max 3148 Points min 1631 avg 2766 median 2960 42% max 3189 Points min 3077 avg 3226 median 3087 44% max 3513 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3688 avg 3721 median 3698 38% max 3776 Points min 1809 avg 1917 median 1920 20% max 1973 Points min 4499 avg 4510 median 47% max 4529 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 8786 avg 8874 median 8874 10% max 8963 Points min 6006 avg 6515 median 6517 7% max 6799 Points min 10162 avg 10366 median 10374 12% max 10553 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 814 avg 1733 median 2021 29% max 2075 Points min 4881 avg 4958 median 71% max 5034 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2952 avg 5482 median 15% max 6552 Points min 10000 avg 10109 median 10109 25% max 10218 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5895 avg 5915 median 5915 9% max 5935 Points min 5674 avg 6126 median 6126 10% max 6578 Points min 7690 avg 7824 median 12% max 7957 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1961 avg 1965 median 1965 29% max 1969 Points min 1933 avg 1954 median 1954 29% max 1975 Points min 2382 avg 2388 median 36% max 2393 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Coremin 3960 avg 4100 median 4100 7% max 4240 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Coremin 1144 avg 1155 median 1155 23% max 1166 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 895 avg 1039 median 1039 8% max 1183 Points min 1810 avg 2308 median 2308 19% max 2806 Points min 1870 avg 1985 median 16% max 2099 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 1898 avg 2002 median 18% max 2105 Points min 2528 avg 3500 median 32% max 4471 Points min 2997 avg 3050 median 28% max 3102 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 10213 avg 10328 median 10328 20% max 10443 Points min 11609 avg 12054 median 24% max 12498 Points min 14240 avg 14552 median 14552 29% max 14864 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5651 avg 5656 median 5656 11% max 5661 Points min 5777 avg 5936 median 12% max 6094 Points min 7271 avg 7404 median 15% max 7536 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 6025 avg 6099 median 16% max 6172 Points min 7193 avg 7226 median 7226 19% max 7259 Points min 8338 avg 8493 median 22% max 8647 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 2060 avg 2509 median 2394 3% max 3189 ms min 2425 avg 3219 median 3175 4% max 4813 ms min 1823 avg 1961 median 2% max 2240 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score *min 210 avg median 3% max 387 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 12933 avg 14397 median 14% max 15233 Points min 3086 avg 11209 median 11484 11% max 14300 Points min 18697 avg 20121 median 19% max 20849 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 63 avg median 68 16% max 72 Points AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total ScoreAnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 214090 avg 218110 median 217950 74% max 222290 Points min 150208 avg 173235 median 175032 60% max 185487 Points min 269219 avg 275038 median 273831 93% max 283270 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 7800 avg 8235 median 8294 25% max 8612 Points min 8164 avg 9635 median 27% max 16148 Points min 12202 avg 12486 median 38% max 13096 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 53528 avg 55588 median 55698 68% max 57538 Points min 42180 avg 44325 median 53% max 47943 Points min 67209 avg 68326 median 68203 84% max 69689 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 91292 avg 92956 median 92887 29% max 94690 Points min 77533 avg 82910 median 83517 26% max 85868 Points min 148074 avg 148912 median 149162 46% max 149249 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 80534 avg 86884 median 88577 54% max 91540 Points min 68241 avg 71814 median 44% max 73371 Points min 97864 avg 99848 median 99722 61% max 102082 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 236552 avg 243663 median 243861 43% max 250577 Points min 201881 avg 208685 median 208251 37% max 217442 Points min 327454 avg 329572 median 328778 58% max 333277 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total ScorePassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 121702 avg 154312 median 154312 20% max 186922 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 2385 avg 2407 median 2407 13% max 2429 Points min 3393 avg 3679 median 3705 20% max 3874 Points min 5013 avg 5063 median 5075 27% max 5101 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 5088 avg 5342 median 11% max 5595 Points min 3927 avg 4679 median 4655 10% max 5195 Points min 8407 avg 8786 median 8830 19% max 9121 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 5184 avg 5411 median 5305 35% max 5851 Points min 5603 avg 6743 median 44% max 7510 Points min 7595 avg 7769 median 7758 51% max 7966 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 5736 avg 6022 median 5891 29% max 6571 Points min 6854 avg 7925 median 40% max 9927 Points min 9557 avg 9777 median 49% max 10008 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Battery Lifemin 476 avg 551 median 11% max 585 min Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 100% n=29Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 → 102% n=29Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9820 → 138% n=29 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculationlog 12. 2221330 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 8554 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 11322 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 9632 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8554 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 8554 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11322 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 11322 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 15 return log +0s ...

snapdragon 835 vs exynos 9810